What Criterion D is looking for:
Reflection on: Self as a learner and performer AND your convention compared to another practice.
Di:
Impact on you as a learner
|
Di:
Impact on you as a performer
|
Dii:
Comparing convention to another practice
|
Journey inward
- Knowledge
- Skills
- Attitudes
- Perspectives
- IB Learner Profile
Etc
|
Journey Outward
Link to your performance work in:
- Shows
- The drama studio
- Performance Workshops
- Other performance experiences
Etc
|
Similarites AND differences to:
- Theory
- Genre
- Style
- Other convention
Etc
|
Research presentation assessment sheet
CRITERIA A 1
|
What/ how
|
Why
|
Explaining a world theatre tradition
|
|
|
Size, shape, relationships
|
|
|
Action (what happens, plots, storylines, acting style)
|
|
|
Design (costume, make-up, set, masks, colours
|
|
|
Cultural/ Theoretical context
|
|
|
Time period
|
|
|
Place
|
|
|
Origins
|
|
|
Links to religions
|
|
|
Evolution
|
|
|
Key people
|
|
|
Links to other theatre practices
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITERIA A2
|
|
|
Explaining a specific performance convention
|
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
Rules
|
|
|
Connection/ relationship to tradition
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOURCES
|
|
|
Range of 5
|
|
|
Specific
|
|
|
In-presentation citations
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITERIA B1
|
|
|
Explaining how they practically and physically have explored the convention
|
|
|
Mimicking videos
|
|
|
Demonstrating physical work (photos/ videos)
|
|
|
Demonstrating feedback use
|
|
|
Physically working from images
|
|
|
Video recording and analysing
|
|
|
Workshops in related field
|
|
|
Activities and exercises
|
|
|
Regular preparations
|
|
|
Peer input
|
|
|
Development over time
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITERIA B2
|
|
|
Explaining how they have approached applying the convention to a moment of theatre
|
|
|
Choosing appropriate performance material
|
|
|
What happened in rehearsals
|
|
|
Using video recording and analysing
|
|
|
Learning lines + moves
|
|
|
Staging
|
|
|
Choosing props and costumes
|
|
|
Performing and getting feedback
|
|
|
Peer input
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITERIA C1
|
|
|
Practically communicating an understanding of the convention through demonstrations
|
|
|
2 MINUTES LONG
|
|
|
Stop-start
|
|
|
Continuous
|
|
|
CRITERIA C2
|
|
|
Using body confidently
|
|
|
Using voice confidently
|
|
|
Convention clearly applied
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITERIA D1
|
|
|
Explaining the impact as learner and as performer
|
|
|
LEARNER
|
|
|
knowledge
|
|
|
skills
|
|
|
attitudes
|
|
|
perspectives
|
|
|
PERFORMER
|
|
|
Links to my other work
|
|
|
On stage in shows
|
|
|
Other IB tasks
|
|
|
Connections to other areas of performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITERIA D2
|
|
|
Explain how the convention compares to one other performance practice
|
|
|
Similarities AND Differences
|
|
|
Tradition
|
|
|
Movement
|
|
|
Theory
|
|
|
Genre
|
|
|
Style
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Assessment Criteria Task 3: Research Presentation
Criterion A. Theatre in context: The tradition
|
To what extent does the student explain a world theatre tradition demonstrating an understanding of the tradition & its cultural and/ or theoretical context(s), effectively supporting their work with a range of appropriate sources?
|
To what extent does the student effectively & clearly explain a specific performance convention selected from the researched theatre tradition, effectively supporting their work with a range of appropriate sources?
|
0
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
1
|
Limited:
The student lists a world theatre tradition, demonstrating a limited & superficial understanding of the tradition & its cultural and/or theoretical context(s), referencing sources that are inappropriate or irrelevant
|
Limited:
The student lists their understanding of a specific performance convention, reference sources that are inappropriate or irrelevant to the work. This work is limited & superficial
|
2
|
Underdeveloped:
The student outlines a world theatre tradition demonstrating some appropriate understanding of the tradition and/or its cultural & theoretical context(s), referencing some sources that are mostly appropriate
|
Underdeveloped:
The student outlines their understanding of a specific performance convention, referencing some appropriate sources that are mostly appropriate to the work. This work is underdeveloped
|
3
|
Good:
The student describes a world theatre tradition, demonstrating a clear understanding of the tradition & its cultural and/or theoretical context(s), adequately supporting their work with a range of appropriate sources
|
Good:
The student describes their understanding of a specific performance convention, adequately supporting their work with a range of appropriate sources. This work is clear & appropriate
|
4
|
Excellent:
The student explains a world theatre tradition, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the tradition & its cultural and/ or theoretical context(s), effectively supporting their work with a range of appropriate sources
|
Excellent:
The student explains their understanding of a specific performance convention, effectively supporting their work with a range of appropriate sources. This work is clear & effective.
|
Criterion B. Theatre processes: Practical research
|
To what extent does the student explain how & why they have practically & physically explored the performance convention selected from the world theatre tradition in the prescribed list?
|
To what extent does the student explain how & why they have approached the application of the convention to an appropriate moment of theatre?
|
0
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
1
|
Limited:
The student lists how they have practically & physically explored the performance convention selected from the world theatre tradition in the prescribed list. This work is limited in scope & contains mainly irrelevant information
|
Limited:
The student lists how they approached the application of the performance convention to a MoT. The moment of theatre may not be appropriate
|
2
|
Underdeveloped:
The student outlines how & why they have practically & physically explored the performance convention selected from the world theatre tradition in the prescribed list, demonstrating a partially appropriate approach for their exploration
|
Underdeveloped:
The student outlines how & why they’ve approached the application of the performance convention to a MoT, but this is underdeveloped.
|
3
|
Good:
The student describes how & why they have practically & physically explored the performance convention selected from the world theatre tradition in the prescribed list, demonstrating a clear & appropriate approach for their exploration
|
Good:
The student describes how & why they have approached the application of the performance convention to an appropriate moment of theatre.
|
4
|
Excellent:
The student explains how & why they have practically & physically explored the performance convention selected from the world theatre tradition in the prescribed list, demonstrating an effective & appropriate approach for their exploration
|
Excellent:
The student explains how & why they have approached the application of the performance convention to an appropriate moment of theatre.
|
Criterion C. Presenting Theatre: The presentation of the moment of theatre
|
To what extent does the student practically communicate an understanding of the performance convention from the tradition through the demonstration of their MoT?
|
To what extent does the student use their body and/or voice effectively & confidently?
|
0
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
1
|
Limited:
The student communicates little or no understanding of the selected performance convention from the world theatre tradition (chosen from the prescribed list) through the demonstration of their moment of theatre, which lacks clarity & coherence
|
Limited:
The student uses their body and/or voice with little or no confidence.
|
2
|
Underdeveloped:
The student partially communicates their understanding of the selected performance convention from the world theatre tradition (chosen from the prescribed list) through the demonstration of their moment of theatre
|
Underdeveloped:
The student uses their body and/or voice with some confidence but this is underdeveloped
|
3
|
Good:
The student adequately communicates their understanding of the selected performance convention from the world theatre tradition (chosen from the prescribed list) through the demonstration of their moment of theatre
|
Good:
The student uses their body and/or voice confidently
|
4
|
Excellent:
The student proficiently communicates their understanding of the selected performance convention from the world theatre tradition (chosen from the prescribed list) through the demonstration of their moment of theatre
|
Excellent:
The student uses their body and/ or voice confidently & effectively.
|
Criterion D. Theatre in context: The learner
|
To what extent does the student explain the impact the investigation has had on them as a learner & as a performer?
|
To what extent does the student explain how the selected performance convention compares to ONE other performance practice?
|
0
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
|
1
|
Limited:
The student lists the impact this learning task has had on them, making few links between their learning in this task & other learning experiences they have had as a performer
|
Limited:
The student lists how the selected performance convention compares to ONE other performance practice), providing few connections and/or comparisons between the selected performance convention & the practice(s). This work is limited in scope or superficial.
|
2
|
Underdeveloped:
The student outlines the impact this learning task has had on them, making links between their learning in this task & other learning experiences they have had as a performer. This is underdeveloped.
|
Underdeveloped:
The student outlines how the selected performance convention compares to ONE other performance practice, providing some connections and/or comparisons between the selected performance convention & the ONE practice. This is underdeveloped.
|
3
|
Good:
The student describes the impact this learning task has had on them, making clear & appropriate links between their learning in this task & other learning experiences they have had as a performer
|
Good:
The student describes how the selected performance convention compares to ONE other performance practice, providing clear connections and/or comparisons between the selected performance convention & the ONE practice.
|
4
|
Excellent:
The student explains the impact this learning task has had on them, making clear, effective & appropriate links between their learning in this task & other learning experiences they have had as a performer
|
Excellent:
The student explains how the selected performance convention compares to ONE other performance practice, providing clear, insightful connections & comparisons between the performance convention & the ONE practice.
|
Editors- joeClinton - 1 word.
- kkaiser - 1531 words.
View count: 9626